While these operations also reduce the size of the stomach,
the stomach pouch created is much larger than with other
procedures. The goal is to restrict the amount of food
consumed and alter the normal digestive process, but to
a much greater degree. The anatomy of the small intestine
is changed to divert the bile and pancreatic juices so
they meet the ingested food closer to the middle or the
end of the small intestine.With the three approaches discussed
below, absorption of nutrients and calories is also reduced,
but to a much greater degree than with previously discussed
procedures. Each of the three differs in how and when
the digestive juices (i.e., bile) come into contact with
the food.
Since food bypasses the duodenum, all the risk considerations
discussed in the gastric bypass section regarding the
malabsorption of some minerals and vitamins also apply
to these techniques, only to a greater degree.
Biliopancreatic Diversion (BPD)
BPD removes approximately 3/4 of the stomach to produce
both restriction of food intake and reduction of acid
output. Leaving enough upper stomach is important to maintain
proper nutrition. The small intestine is then divided
with one end attached to the stomach pouch to create what
is called an "alimentary limb." All the food moves through
this segment, however, not much is absorbed. The bile
and pancreatic juices move through the "biliopancreatic
limb," which is connected to the side of the intestine
close to the end. This supplies digestive juices in the
section of the intestine now called the "common limb."
The surgeon is able to vary the length of the common limb
to regulate the amount of absorption of protein, fat and
fat-soluble vitamins.
Extended (Distal) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGBP-E)
RYGBP-E is an alternative means of achieving malabsorption
by creating a stapled or divided small gastric pouch,
leaving the remainder of stomach in place. A long limb
of the small intestine is attached to the stomach to divert
the bile and pancreatic juices. This procedure carries
with it fewer operative risks by avoiding removal of the
lower 3/4 of the stomach. Gastric pouch size and the length
of the bypassed intestine determine the risks for ulcers,
malnutrition and other effects.
Biliopancreatic Diversion with "Duodenal Switch"
This procedure is a variation of BPD in which stomach
removal is restricted to the outer margin, leaving a sleeve
of stomach with the pylorus and the beginning of the duodenum
at its end. The duodenum, the first portion of the small
intestine, is divided so that pancreatic and bile drainage
is bypassed. The near end of the "alimentary limb" is
then attached to the beginning of the duodenum, while
the "common limb" is created in the same way as described
above.
Advantages
- These operations often result in a high degree of
patient satisfaction because patients are able to eat
larger meals than with a purely restrictive or standard
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure.
- These procedures can produce the greatest excess weight
loss because they provide the highest levels of malabsorption.
- In one study of 125 patients, excess weight loss of
74% at one year, 78% at two years, 81% at three years,
84% at four years, and 91% at five years was achieved.
- Long-term maintenance of excess body weight loss can
be successful if the patient adapts and adheres to a
straightforward dietary, supplement, exercise and behavioral
regimen.
Risks
- For all malabsorption procedures there is a period
of intestinal adaptation when bowel movements can be
very liquid and frequent. This condition may lessen
over time, but may be a permanent lifelong occurrence.
- Abdominal bloating and malodorous stool or gas may
occur.
- Close lifelong monitoring for protein malnutrition,
anemia and bone disease is recommended. As well, lifelong
vitamin supplementing is required. It has been generally
observed that if eating and vitamin supplement instructions
are not rigorously followed, at least 25% of patients
will develop problems that require treatment.
- Changes to the intestinal structure can result in
the increased risk of gallstone formation and the need
for removal of the gallbladder.
- Re-routing of bile, pancreatic and other digestive
juices beyond the stomach can cause intestinal irritation
and ulcers.
Proximal Gastric Bypass
Roux-en-Y
In recent years, better clinical understanding of procedures
combining restrictive and malabsorptive approaches has
increased the choices of effective weight loss surgery
for thousands of patients. By adding malabsorption, food
is delayed in mixing with bile and pancreatic juices that
aid in the absorption of nutrients. The result is an early
sense of fullness, combined with a sense of satisfaction
that reduces the desire to eat.
According to the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
and the National Institutes of Health, Roux-en-Y gastric
bypass is the current gold standard procedure for weight
loss surgery. It is one of the most frequently performed
weight loss procedures in the United States. In this procedure,
stapling creates a small (15 to 20cc) stomach pouch. The
remainder of the stomach is not removed, but is completely
stapled shut and divided from the stomach pouch. The outlet
from this newly formed pouch empties directly into the
lower portion of the jejunum, thus bypassing calorie absorption.
This is done by dividing the small intestine just beyond
the duodenum for the purpose of bringing it up and constructing
a connection with the newly formed stomach pouch. The
other end is connected into the side of the Roux limb
of the intestine creating the "Y" shape that gives the
technique its name. The length of either segment of the
intestine can be increased to produce lower or higher
levels of malabsorption.
Advantages
- The average excess weight loss after the Roux-en-Y
procedure is generally higher in a compliant patient
than with purely restrictive procedures.
- One year after surgery, weight loss can average 77%
of excess body weight.
- Studies show that after 10 to 14 years, 50-60% of
excess body weight loss has been maintained by some
patients.
- A 2000 study of 500 patients showed that 96% of certain
associated health conditions studied (back pain, sleep
apnea, high blood pressure, diabetes and depression)
were improved or resolved.
Risks
- Because the duodenum is bypassed, poor absorption
of iron and calcium can result in the lowering of total
body iron and a predisposition to iron deficiency anemia.
This is a particular concern for patients who experience
chronic blood loss during excessive menstrual flow or
bleeding hemorrhoids. Women, already at risk for osteoporosis
that can occur after menopause, should be aware of the
potential for heightened bone calcium loss.
- Bypassing the duodenum has caused metabolic bone disease
in some patients, resulting in bone pain, loss of height,
humped back and fractures of the ribs and hip bones.
All of the deficiencies mentioned above, however, can
be managed through proper diet and vitamin supplements.
- A chronic anemia due to Vitamin B12 deficiency may
occur. The problem can usually be managed with Vitamin
B12 pills or injections.
- A condition known as "dumping syndrome " can occur
as the result of rapid emptying of stomach contents
into the small intestine. This is sometimes triggered
when too much sugar or large amounts of food are consumed.
While generally not considered to be a serious risk
to your health, the results can be extremely unpleasant
and can include nausea, weakness, sweating, faintness
and, on occasion, diarrhea after eating. Some patients
are unable to eat any form of sweets after surgery.
- In some cases, the effectiveness of the procedure
may be reduced if the stomach pouch is stretched and/or
if it is initially left larger than 15-30cc.
- The bypassed portion of the stomach, duodenum and
segments of the small intestine cannot be easily visualized
using X-ray or endoscopy if problems such as ulcers,
bleeding or malignancy should occur.
Dr. Wittgrove is experienced in Revisional Bariatric
Surgery, having been in bariatric surgery for 20 years,
in the San Diego area and now in La
Jolla. He has presented lectures on this
subject both nationally and internationally. In
this section we will discuss the special concerns one
must think of when there is a consideration of having
a revision of a bariatric surgery and our program’s
philosophy regarding these issues.
Although bariatric surgery is usually quite effective,
at times, it does not work as well as one would like. In
such instances, a surgical revision may be considered. When
contemplating another bariatric operation, we must decide
if a revision will work and what the risks of such a
procedure will be. There are several factors that
help us make this decision:
- When the initial operation was performed.
- Where the initial operation was performed.
- At what stage the surgeon was in his / her career.
- The postoperative instructions given after the initial
surgery.
- Initial weight loss history following surgery.
- Any complications that may have occurred following
the initial operation.
Now, we will discuss each of these factors individually. The
type of bariatric surgery initially performed is very
important when considering revision because some types
of surgery have been known to fail or have less long-term
success. Obtaining an operative report for your
surgery is very helpful. However, if you cannot
provide an operative report, we usually know the type
of surgery simply by knowing when and where it was performed. Also,
because Dr. Wittgrove has been a bariatric surgeon since
1986, he is familiar with many surgeons currently practicing
as well as those who have since retired.
A “learning curve” exists for most operations
and bariatric surgery has one of the longest. This
is especially true when we consider the Laparoscopic
Gastric Bypass. It is often helpful to know at
what stage your surgeon was in their career when you
were treated. For example, the success of gastric
bypass surgery is largely dependent upon the size of
the gastric pouch. This part of the surgery is
technically challenging and often requires the surgeon
to have performed many operations before mastering it. As
a result, a surgeon may have made very large gastric
pouches early in their career. Furthermore, some
surgeons continue to make large pouches despite our current
understanding that pouch size and weight loss are more
directly related.
Oftentimes, the postoperative instructions given to
patients are incorrect or lacking. Therefore, the
patient did not know the best way to use their new “tool”. Even
though the patient may be out of the “golden period” for
rapid weight loss, they usually benefit considerably
from proper instruction and can therefore avoid additional
surgery.
Weight loss history following the initial surgery tells
us if the operation was ever effective or if it “failed
the patient” from the very beginning. If
postoperative weight loss never occurred or was minimal
then it is likely that there was a technical problem
with the operation.
Likewise, complications occurring after the surgery
may have led to technical problems that have influenced
the durability of the weight loss. Such complications
may include intraabdominal infections, ulcerations, band
infections, and prolonged vomiting postoperatively.
Considering bariatric surgery as a “tool” to
be used for long-term weight loss, we must determine
if the patient has used their “tool” ineffectively
or if the patient’s “tool” does not
work. If the “tool” has not been used
effectively then it is unlikely that a revision would
be beneficial. However, if the “tool” is
broken or never worked, then a revision may be beneficial.
For example, if the pouch of a gastric bypass was
made too large then the patient may lose weight
for the first year but eventually lose their sense
of satiety or restriction and gain weight. Usually
an upper GI x-ray series will help us determine the
pouch size.
If a patient had gastric banding, they may never
feel “satisfied” with small meals. Commonly,
gastric banding does not give patients the same feedback
of satiety that the gastric bypass provides. In
such cases, a revision to a gastric bypass may benefit
the patient. However, taking down the scar around
the band can be quite technically difficult.
If a patient had a vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG)/
stomach stapling, they may have initially lost weight
only to lose their feeling of restriction and regain
the weight. Several technical
failures arise with this type of surgery over time. It
is appropriate to consider revision to a gastric bypass
if one of these failures has occurred.
Finally, remember that revision operations are more
technically challenging and carry a higher complication
risk. Patients need to seek out very experienced
bariatric surgeons that perform revision surgeries. Not
everyone who regains weight or fails to lose as much
weight as they would have liked are candidates for revisional
surgery. Because morbid obesity is a multi-factorial
disease, a multi-disciplined approach should be utilized
to treat patients that have regained or failed to lose
weight.
Successful bariatric surgery starts with the operation. Some
operations have been done much longer and have been proven
to be more durable over time. Gastric bypass surgery
is one such operation. Postoperative instruction
and support is also very important. Snacking behavior,
poor water intake, lack of exercise, and poor supplementation
intake can all lead to poor outcomes.
When patients are being evaluated for a revision in
our program, a consultation with the surgeon is scheduled. At
that time all tests are reviewed as well as the operative
report, if provided. Our surgeon then assesses
the risks and potential benefits of revision surgery
for the patient. Nearly all our program’s
operations are now performed laparoscopically and with
that in mind, our surgeon will discuss the possibility
of performing the operation laparoscopically. If
surgery is indicated and the potential risks are understood,
our program can provide years of experience in revisional
bariatric surgery to help you achieve your goal.